![]() The weight parameter in your first example might just provide a small button to jump into the field-graph. The field could be managed in a manner similar to sub-graphs in a group node, but on a per parameter basis. Having the definition of the field in that case outside of the node itself makes it hard for the user understand what the context really provides. ![]() However the context then can change quite drastically for each field being defined. ![]() Surely making the node the context is the more flexible approach and in my opinion be the preferred choice. I think it’s important to decide about this specific concept of the context and evaluate the different implications. This context is typically given in the form of a geometry that the field is evaluated on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |